On Thu, 7 Oct 2021 23:56:57 +0200 Dominik George wrote: > Hi, Hello! > > some times, we (the AlekSIS team) stumble upon upstream maintainers > who consider it funny to add amendments to licenses, or make up fun > licenses on their own. Personally, I think licenses and jokes are best left distinct. Inserting the latter into the former is often a bad idea... [...] > "BUT if you become a millionaire using this code, please bought > me a new brand luxury sailboat." [...] > "Please do whatever your mom would approve of. No tattoos, > No touching food with unwashed hands, No exchanging for drugs" [...] However, these two examples look more like kind requests, rather than legally binding requirements. The first one says "please bought me" [I think it should be "please buy me"]: you are not forced to do so. The second starts with "Please do". I think the continuation "No ... No ... No ..." is just an enumeration of what your mom would disapprove of. What do other debian-legal participants think? -- http://www.inventati.org/frx/ There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory! ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
Attachment:
pgp3GvF9BhcG_.pgp
Description: PGP signature