[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: 3Com 3CCFEM556B and Testing



I get the same message after upgrading to kernel 2.4.8. After a short search
in the mailing list archives I found this message
(http://lists.debian.org/debian-laptop/2001/debian-laptop-200108/msg00066.ht
ml)

>Hi
>You have to modify your /etc/default/pcmcia file to use YENTA instead of
i82365 because >the YENTA driver replace de previous cardbus driver.
>check well the yenta driver name and replace i82365 with this one.

Myself, I haven't had time to try this yet, but I will soon. It solved the
problem for the person who originally posted it (see the next message in the
above thread).

Hope this will help (for you and for me =)

/petter

----- Original Message -----
From: " Paul C. Nendick " <pauly@enteract.com>
To: <debian-laptop@lists.debian.org>
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 5:49 AM
Subject: 3Com 3CCFEM556B and Testing


> Hello all,
>
> I'm currently running Debian testing with the latest kernel and pcmcia
> packages loaded on a Toshiba Libretto 100ct.  I am trying to get my
> 3Com 3CCFEM556B multifunction card to work.  So far, this setup worked
> effortlessly with RedHat and FreeBSD, but not with Debian.  Please help,
> I like Debian so much more.....
>
> When I issue `/etc/init.d/pcmcia start`, I get:
> /lib/modules/2.4.9-586tsc/pcmcia/i82365.o: unresolved symbol
isapnp_find_dev_R76S1deff
> ds: no socket drivers loaded!
> /lib/modules/2.4.9-586tsc/pcmcia/ds.o: init_module: Operation not
permitted
> Hint: insmod errors can be caused by incorrect module parameters,
including
> invalid IO or IRQ parameters
>  cardmgr .
> And when I issue `cardctl status` or `cardinfo`, I get:
> no pcmcia driver in /proc/devices
>
>
> I have tried both the default settings in /etc/pcmcia/config.opts and
> settings that force the IRQ to be 10.
>
> Ideas?
>
> /paul
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-laptop-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
>



Reply to: