Re: dummy package

To: debian-l10n-italian@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: dummy package
From: _Cri_ <bigamons@freemail.it>
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 01:08:31 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20030304000831.GA439@wamozart.buliga.it>
Mail-followup-to: debian-l10n-italian@lists.debian.org
Reply-to: _Cri_ <bigamons@freemail.it>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20030303201821.GB1333@banach>
References: <[🔎] 20030303163856.B23154@denver.sociol.unimi.it> <[🔎] 20030303201821.GB1333@banach>

On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 09:18:21PM +0100, davide - dissident wrote:
> 
> io penserei la seconda, cmq package si dovrebbe lasciare così, in quanto
...

Io ho sempre tradotto "dummy" = "fittizio", ma "package" l'ho sempre visto
tradotto con "pacchetto"... A che direttive di riferisci?

Cri

-- 
[    GLUX! - http://www.lecco.linux.it  -  irc.eu.freenode.net -> #glux    ]
[      Signed / encrypted mail welcome  -  GPG/PGP Key-Id: 0x943A5F0E      ]
[       http://www.lecco.linux.it/index.php?link=documenti/trad.html       ]

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: dummy package
  - From: davide - dissident <punkow@softhome.net>

References:
- dummy package
  - From: Yuri <yuri@sociol.unimi.it>
- Re: dummy package
  - From: davide - dissident <punkow@softhome.net>

Prev by Date: Re: dummy package
Next by Date: Re: dummy package
Previous by thread: Re: dummy package
Next by thread: Re: dummy package
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread