[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1067006: marked as done (rpc-statd.service: State 'stop-sigterm' timed out. Killing.)



Your message dated Wed, 10 Apr 2024 09:00:17 +0200
with message-id <ZhY5AVIQJrfx1bmx@eldamar.lan>
and subject line Re: Bug#1067006: rpc-statd.service: State 'stop-sigterm' timed out. Killing.
has caused the Debian Bug report #1067006,
regarding rpc-statd.service: State 'stop-sigterm' timed out. Killing.
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1067006: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067006
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: nfs-common
Version: 1:2.6.4-3

Restarting rpc-statd.service (e.g via needrestart at upgrade time)
runs into a timeout:

Mar 16 20:06:58 lola.afaics.de systemd[1]: rpc-statd.service: State 'stop-sigterm' timed out. Killing.
Mar 16 20:06:58 lola.afaics.de systemd[1]: rpc-statd.service: Killing process 2342 (rpc.statd) with signal SIGKILL.
Mar 16 20:06:58 lola.afaics.de systemd[1]: rpc-statd.service: Main process exited, code=killed, status=9/KILL
Mar 16 20:06:58 lola.afaics.de systemd[1]: rpc-statd.service: Failed with result 'timeout'.
Mar 16 20:06:58 lola.afaics.de systemd[1]: Stopped rpc-statd.service - NFS status monitor for NFSv2/3 locking..
Mar 16 20:06:58 lola.afaics.de systemd[1]: Starting rpcbind.service - RPC bind portmap service...
Mar 16 20:06:58 lola.afaics.de systemd[1]: Started rpcbind.service - RPC bind portmap service.
Mar 16 20:06:58 lola.afaics.de systemd[1]: Starting rpc-statd.service - NFS status monitor for NFSv2/3 locking....
Mar 16 20:06:58 lola.afaics.de rpc.statd[49886]: Version 2.6.4 starting
Mar 16 20:06:58 lola.afaics.de rpc.statd[49886]: Flags: TI-RPC
Mar 16 20:06:58 lola.afaics.de systemd[1]: Started rpc-statd.service - NFS status monitor for NFSv2/3 locking..

Please reassign if necessary


Regards

Harri

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Harald,

On Sat, Mar 16, 2024 at 08:59:26PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Sat, Mar 16, 2024 at 08:13:44PM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> > Package: nfs-common
> > Version: 1:2.6.4-3
> > 
> > Restarting rpc-statd.service (e.g via needrestart at upgrade time)
> > runs into a timeout:
> > 
> > Mar 16 20:06:58 lola.afaics.de systemd[1]: rpc-statd.service: State 'stop-sigterm' timed out. Killing.
> > Mar 16 20:06:58 lola.afaics.de systemd[1]: rpc-statd.service: Killing process 2342 (rpc.statd) with signal SIGKILL.
> > Mar 16 20:06:58 lola.afaics.de systemd[1]: rpc-statd.service: Main process exited, code=killed, status=9/KILL
> > Mar 16 20:06:58 lola.afaics.de systemd[1]: rpc-statd.service: Failed with result 'timeout'.
> > Mar 16 20:06:58 lola.afaics.de systemd[1]: Stopped rpc-statd.service - NFS status monitor for NFSv2/3 locking..
> > Mar 16 20:06:58 lola.afaics.de systemd[1]: Starting rpcbind.service - RPC bind portmap service...
> > Mar 16 20:06:58 lola.afaics.de systemd[1]: Started rpcbind.service - RPC bind portmap service.
> > Mar 16 20:06:58 lola.afaics.de systemd[1]: Starting rpc-statd.service - NFS status monitor for NFSv2/3 locking....
> > Mar 16 20:06:58 lola.afaics.de rpc.statd[49886]: Version 2.6.4 starting
> > Mar 16 20:06:58 lola.afaics.de rpc.statd[49886]: Flags: TI-RPC
> > Mar 16 20:06:58 lola.afaics.de systemd[1]: Started rpc-statd.service - NFS status monitor for NFSv2/3 locking..
> > 
> > Please reassign if necessary
> 
> I cannot reproduce this. If this was not a one-time off issue on your
> system, do you have a way to reproduce the behaviour to further
> investigate it?

Closing it now as I'm not able to reproduce the issue. If you can
please do reopen the bug without hesitation.

Regards,
Salvatore

--- End Message ---

Reply to: