[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

linux-signed-arm64_6.5~rc7+1~exp1_source.changes ACCEPTED into experimental



Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

Mapping rc-buggy to experimental.

Accepted:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2023 21:49:11 +0200
Source: linux-signed-arm64
Architecture: source
Version: 6.5~rc7+1~exp1
Distribution: rc-buggy
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team <debian-kernel@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
Changes:
 linux-signed-arm64 (6.5~rc7+1~exp1) experimental; urgency=medium
 .
   * Sign kernel from linux 6.5~rc7-1~exp1
 .
   * New upstream release candidate
 .
   [ Salvatore Bonaccorso ]
   * linux-image: bug: Update taint list and use upstream descriptions
   * [rt] Refresh "serial: 8250: implement non-BKL console"
 .
   [ Miguel Bernal Marin ]
   * [amd64] mm: Enable MEMORY_HOTPLUG_DEFAULT_ONLINE: Enable Online the newly
     added memory blocks by default (Closes: #1049901)
 .
   [ Helge Deller ]
   * [hppa] Add build-dependency on binutils-dev to get bfd.h and thus allow
     disassembly of jitted programs in bpftool
Checksums-Sha1:
 7f8599342f11ab3fa8b32182f3749b3a3899dc97 7407 linux-signed-arm64_6.5~rc7+1~exp1.dsc
 d601fb5ad1425377307b17b7a5c8b362977d3e5e 2860500 linux-signed-arm64_6.5~rc7+1~exp1.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 6fc1cc4d2bb82ac9ec8b58ad99c17351dc9679cb28211263e01b72c479ccefe5 7407 linux-signed-arm64_6.5~rc7+1~exp1.dsc
 df79fbeada6f10869e0cddcc04fa453c238543d1d546ef4882ef8827c1f9836b 2860500 linux-signed-arm64_6.5~rc7+1~exp1.tar.xz
Files:
 6bec81e312987bb825ab4a1b76f450c6 7407 kernel optional linux-signed-arm64_6.5~rc7+1~exp1.dsc
 088d18a05bd295fed2fa165006087371 2860500 kernel optional linux-signed-arm64_6.5~rc7+1~exp1.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=dPlQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: