Control: reassign -1 src:linux 6.1.37-1 Control: tag -1 upstream fixed-upstream On Tuesday, 1 August 2023 11:22:17 CEST AP wrote: > Package: linux-image-6.1.0-10-amd64 > Severity: important > Tags: patch > > Current kernel failed to load modules for MASQUERADE nat rules giving the > following in dmesg: > > [37404.063872] BPF: [99720] ENUM STROY > [37404.064350] BPF: size=4 vlen=14 > [37404.064699] BPF: > [37404.065000] BPF: Invalid name > [37404.065287] BPF: > [37404.065463] failed to validate module [nf_conntrack] BTF: -22 > [37404.067137] missing module BTF, cannot register kfuncs > > The following upstream patch fixes the issue: > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id= > 3de4d22cc9ac7c9f38e10edcf54f9a8891a9c2aa > > And it has been included in upstream stable 6.1 kernel releases since > 6.1.39: > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/log/?h=linu > x-6.1.y&ofs=400 Awesome bug report, thanks! I've extended the list to document other kernel series and their fixes: master: 3de4d22cc9ac7c9f38e10edcf54f9a8891a9c2aa included in 6.5-rc1 6.4: 90b9e7202676742ede5f1e6c46000a53c6a6c4c0 included in 6.4.4 6.1: 6baa6e4836d75a5d693c18dbf79b0695f05697e9 included in 6.1.39 5.10: none, also not queued (yet on 2023-08-01). Doesn't have the commit that it Fixes, so it may not have been in 5.10 to begin with > PS: This, I think, is covered in bug 1003965 but my attempt to email into > that bug appears to have failed. It would seem so, but I have decided not to merge the bugs as that bug was found in 5.15.5-2, but the 5.15 series has the same 'problem' as the 5.10 series: it doesn't have the commit that it fixes (in my initial search). So _could_ it be that #1003965 and #1042237 are actually 2 different bugs? Ben: Could you look at this and take appropriate action? Cheers, Diederik
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.