Hi, Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> (2023-04-22): > Noteworthy is that > https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/merge_requests/695 the > regression for Open Firmware framebuffer, #1033058 is *not* yet > included, as there was no ack upstream on Cyril's proposed patchset. Just in: > I've applied the series (2 patches, one of them in drm) to the fbdev git tree. https://lore.kernel.org/all/9f6547e5-ba5d-11bf-3646-2f65b4a6a2ea@gmx.de/ > From d-i/boot point of view I have an IRC ack from Cyril that the > upload is ok, but potentially the upcoming next d-i release will be > based on 6.1.20-2 in testing. So next week we might need to decide if > moving 6.1.25-1 to testing or hold it back for after the d-i release. Please let me know once you consider 6.1.25-1 ready for migration. Since we're looking at a release date in June, we have some time to work on several D-I release candidates if we want to, so we can either hold linux in unstable a little to publish the d-i RC, or we can hold the RC a little, let linux into testing, and publish d-i once we've toyed with the new linux a little more. (If we were aiming at a release on May 13 as was envisioned for a little while, I would definitely prioritize getting the d-i RC out ASAP, and consider linux only after that, though.) Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (kibi@debian.org) <https://debamax.com/> D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature