[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#801067: marked as done (nfs-common: Remove or updated README.Debian.nfsv4)

Your message dated Tue, 8 Mar 2022 06:38:03 +0100
with message-id <[🔎] Yibruxoau+TBvu6J@lorien.valinor.li>
and subject line Re: Bug#801067: nfs-common: Remove or updated README.Debian.nfsv4
has caused the Debian Bug report #801067,
regarding nfs-common: Remove or updated README.Debian.nfsv4
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
801067: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=801067
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: nfs-common
Version: 1:1.2.8-6ubuntu1.1
Severity: normal

The README.Debian.nfsv4 file is now rather old; is NFSv4 really still
considered experimental?

Parts of this file may be worth keeping (I’m not an expert!), but at least
that claim should be removed, and mention of kernel versions and patch sets.

-- Package-specific info:
-- rpcinfo --
   program vers proto   port  service
    100000    4   tcp    111  portmapper
    100000    3   tcp    111  portmapper
    100000    2   tcp    111  portmapper
    100000    4   udp    111  portmapper
    100000    3   udp    111  portmapper
    100000    2   udp    111  portmapper
    100024    1   udp  43250  status
    100024    1   tcp  59720  status
-- /etc/default/nfs-common --
NEED_STATD=
STATDOPTS=
NEED_GSSD=
-- /etc/idmapd.conf --
[General]
Verbosity = 0
Pipefs-Directory = /run/rpc_pipefs
[Mapping]
Nobody-User = rrt
Nobody-Group = rrt
-- /etc/fstab --

-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers trusty-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'trusty-updates'), (500, 'trusty-security'), (500, 'trusty'), (400, 'trusty-proposed'), (100, 'trusty-backports'), (90, 'wily-updates'), (90, 'wily')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.13.0-63-generic (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages nfs-common depends on:
ii  adduser             3.113+nmu3ubuntu3
ii  initscripts         2.88dsf-41ubuntu6.2
ii  libc6               2.19-0ubuntu6.6
ii  libcap2             1:2.24-0ubuntu2
ii  libcomerr2          1.42.9-3ubuntu1.3
ii  libdevmapper1.02.1  2:1.02.77-6ubuntu2
ii  libevent-2.0-5      2.0.21-stable-1ubuntu1.14.04.1
ii  libgssglue1         0.4-2ubuntu1
ii  libkeyutils1        1.5.6-1
ii  libkrb5-3           1.12+dfsg-2ubuntu5.1
ii  libmount1           2.20.1-5.1ubuntu20.7
ii  libnfsidmap2        0.25-5
ii  libtirpc1           0.2.2-5ubuntu2
ii  libwrap0            7.6.q-25
ii  lsb-base            4.1+Debian11ubuntu6
ii  mountall            2.53
ii  rpcbind             0.2.1-2ubuntu2.2
ii  sysv-rc             2.88dsf-41ubuntu6.2
ii  ucf                 3.0027+nmu1

Versions of packages nfs-common recommends:
ii  python  2.7.5-5ubuntu3

Versions of packages nfs-common suggests:
pn  open-iscsi  <none>
pn  watchdog    <none>

Versions of packages nfs-kernel-server depends on:
ii  libblkid1     2.20.1-5.1ubuntu20.7
ii  libc6         2.19-0ubuntu6.6
ii  libcap2       1:2.24-0ubuntu2
ii  libsqlite3-0  3.8.2-1ubuntu2.1
ii  libtirpc1     0.2.2-5ubuntu2
ii  libwrap0      7.6.q-25
ii  lsb-base      4.1+Debian11ubuntu6
ii  ucf           3.0027+nmu1

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: nfs-utils
Source-Version: 1:2.6.1-1

On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 09:32:39PM +0100, Reuben Thomas wrote:
> Package: nfs-common
> Version: 1:1.2.8-6ubuntu1.1
> Severity: normal
> 
> The README.Debian.nfsv4 file is now rather old; is NFSv4 really still
> considered experimental?
> 
> Parts of this file may be worth keeping (I???m not an expert!), but at least
> that claim should be removed, and mention of kernel versions and patch sets.

We have removed the outdated README.Debian.nfsv4 in the 1:2.6.1-1
upload.

Regards,
Salvatore

--- End Message ---
Reply to: