On Wed 2020-03-11 03:50:00 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote: > If some of the packages providing a virtual package are explicitly > installed, and some auto-installed, it could reasonably auto-remove the > latter group (though I don't think it does). But if all of them are > auto-installed, which will be the case for kernel packages, it can't > tell which should be kept and which removed. hm, right, i can see how that would be a problem. thanks for the explanation. > But nothing will auto-remove the wireguard package. So you would have > to keep it as a transitional package for one release cycle, even when > it depends on just wireguard-tools. I don't think it would be a problem to have a transitional package for one release cycle. do you? > Yes, this is annoyingly complicated. That's why I need there to be a > plan. I'm open to any suggestions that you think would work better than what we've talked about so far. Let me know what you prefer. --dkg
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature