[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#793786: initramfs-tools: fix the broken netconsole feature in initramfs-tools



On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 8:13 AM, Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-01-10 at 16:20 +0900, Roger Shimizu wrote:
>> I find current v2 patch will sometimes fail because it load netconsole.ko before
>> loading network driver.
>
> So maybe we should run 'udevadm settle' before loading modules?

I don't understand this part.
If you have patch, I can run it in my netconsole testable environment,
then feedback the log.

>> I made some changes based on patch v3, can confirmed various scenarios,
>> including "MODULES=most" you mentioned. So here's patch v4.
>> (also in my github repo's netconsole branch:
>> https://github.com/rogers0/initramfs-tools/tree/netconsole)
>>
>> the fix already takes various cases into account:
>> - MODULES=most (default) or MODULES={dep,list} (popular for embedded devices)
>> - netconsole param may be inside conf/modules or come with bootloader's config
>>
>> for "MODULES=most" case , netconsole.ko is included by default, so there's
>> no need to list it in conf/modules, and netconsole param should be put into
>> bootloader's config
>>
>> for "MODULES={dep,list}" case, netconsole param can be either from
>> conf/modules or bootloader, and the previous one is preferred if both are
>> specified.
> [...]
>
> The kernel parameter should be preferred if both are specified.  (In
> general, the most specific configuration source should take
> precedence.)

Yes, I agree.
I meant if both are *same* specific level, param from conf/modules
will be preferred.
It's what's the test case A2 for.

Cheers,
Roger


Reply to: