[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#678731: marked as done (linux-2.6: Please build dummy_hcd and g_mass_storage modules)



Your message dated Thu, 11 Jul 2013 23:20:11 +0200
with message-id <20130711212010.GA7953@pisco.westfalen.local>
and subject line Re: Bug#678731: linux-2.6: Please build dummy_hcd and g_mass_storage modules
has caused the Debian Bug report #678731,
regarding linux-2.6: Please build dummy_hcd and g_mass_storage modules
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
678731: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=678731
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: linux-2.6
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: tails-dev@boum.org
User: tails-dev@boum.org
Usertags: testing

Hi!

Please build dummy_hcd and g_mass_storage modules.

The USB dummy HCD and Mass Storage Gadget would be very useful to
implement automated testing of Live systems such as Tails [0], where
some features are only available when installed on USB: it would be
great to avoid plugging a bunch of real USB sticks into an server in
a datacenter, while the Linux kernel has the needed functionality to
emulate such hardware.

Thank you.

  [0] https://tails.boum.org/
  [1] https://mailman.boum.org/pipermail/tails-dev/2012-June/001320.html



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 09:35:28PM +0200, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote (08 Jul 2013 16:22:52 GMT) :
> > How's the state of affairs with libvirt 1.1 from unstable?
> 
> We (at Tails) have submitted a patchset upstream to add the support we
> need to libvirt and virt-manager. It's waiting for their review.
> 
> So, I think we won't need the functionality we've asked for in this
> bug report. I wouldn't mind if the maintainers closed it.
> 
> Thanks for caring!

Ok, let's close the bug, then.

Cheers,
        Moritz

--- End Message ---

Reply to: