Eugen Dedu wrote: > No problem for me, I am glad that it works on 3.4! So if you > prefer, you can close this bug. I'd rather get it fixed in 3.2.y since we will be maintaining that for a while. Would you be interested in pursuing that (by testing it and contacting upstream and cc-ing us when it next happens)? If not, that's fine and we probably should close it. Thanks again. Jonathan