Bug#463611: marked as done (NO battery directory in /proc/acpi)
Your message dated Fri, 8 Feb 2008 14:44:05 +0100
with message-id <[🔎] 20080208134405.GA8928@stro.at>
and subject line Bug#463611: NO battery directory in /proc/acpi
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: linux-image-2.6.24-1-686
Version: 2.6.24-2
Severity: important
I noticed that conky prints always "accu" as battery status and
on_ac_power has the return code 255.
% on_ac_power ; echo $?
255
I grepped different battery.ko modules for "proc":
Debian 2.6.24:
% strings /lib/modules/2.6.24-1-686/kernel/drivers/acpi/battery.ko | grep
proc
acpi_bus_generate_proc_event
Debian 2.6.23:
% strings /lib/modules/2.6.23-1-686/kernel/drivers/acpi/battery.ko | grep
proc
acpi_bus_generate_proc_event
create_proc_entry
proc_mkdir
remove_proc_entry
Ubuntu hardy:
% strings /lib/modules/2.6.24-5-generic/kernel/drivers/acpi/battery.ko |
grep proc
acpi_bus_generate_proc_event
create_proc_entry
proc_mkdir
remove_proc_entry
--
Ist Ihr Browser Vista-kompatibel? Jetzt die neuesten
Browser-Versionen downloaden: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/browser
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Fri, 08 Feb 2008, Alberto Maurizi wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 10:57:15AM +0100, Dr. Markus Waldeck wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I updated to linux-image-2.6.24-1-686 2.6.24-3 and
> > CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS_POWER=y is set.
> >
> > conky works fine!
ok :)
cloning #462305 to conky.
userspace will get another wake up call for 2.6.25.
yes for now too much broke left and right..
> > Thanks
> >
> > Dr. Markus Waldeck
>
> gnome-power-manager detects two batteries and is a bit confused
> about the status of them.
>
> to solve this it is necessary to unset CONFIG_ACPI_SYSFS_POWER
>
> however it would be better to adapt gnome-power-manager to the
> SYS power tree rather tha maintaining an ad-hoc kernel for it.
this is harmless and a known hal bug fixed in hal upstream.
closing that bug report.
bon weekend
--- End Message ---
Reply to: