Hello, On ketvirtadienis 06 Gegužė 2010 23:12:31 Mike Bird wrote: > On Thu May 6 2010 12:02:05 Dotan Cohen wrote: > > Do you customarily read the complete email headers of those whom > > with which you correspond? > > Email headers are not relevant to most discussions, therefore no. > > My point is that many KDE developers and packagers do not use KDE > like real-world users, and therefore do not appreciate the concerns > of real-world KDE users. They don't because KDE SC is bloated. And they never did. It is not a secret that Debian KDE team is lacking manpower. But you can be sure that there is at least one person using each particular piece of software - a developer who is writing the code (unless the code is not maintained anymore). One typically doesn't waste precious *free* time on coding stuff that has no personal use. > The whole semantic desktop idea is a bad joke in the real MULTI-USER > world. If semantics are to have any value they must evolve on the > server from all the members of the workgroup, not an isolated user. > The semantic desktop was fifty years out of date before the first line > of code was written. It's sole achievement is draining laptop batteries. Cloud computing can't come too fast, can it? Honestly, I'm not a fan of nepomuk/akonadi as well. So I'm no longer installing KDE SC where its bloat becomes a problem and/or is not necessary. Yet it is still the most productive environment for me personally. > We've had more than two years of being told "KDE SC 4 is good enough". > > It is not. Ultimate undeniable truth. Word. -- Modestas Vainius <modestas@vainius.eu>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.