Re: Updated java policy
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 06:17:53PM +1000, Ben Burton wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> Hmm? I thought we were allowing the choice of (1) splitting *.class and JNI
> libraries into -java and -jni packages, or (2) bundling them all into a
> single arch-dependent -java package when the package is so small that the
> split appears to be more hassle than it's worth.
That is why there is a should in there. If you have suggestions on how
to write it better I appriciate such wishlist bugs. :)
Regards
// Ola
> The fragment of policy below seems to insist on (1) only.
>
> > <para>
> > If the Java code depends on code written in a "native" language,
> > for example Java Native Interface code, the compiled native code
> > &should; be shipped in a separate architecture-specific package.
> > The package containing Java bytecode should depend on this
> > package.
> > </para>
>
> Perhaps I missed part of the thread there?
>
> Ben.
>
> - --
>
> Ben Burton
> benb@acm.org | bab@debian.org
> Public Key: finger bab@db.debian.org
>
> Questions are never indiscreet. Answers sometimes are.
> - Oscar Wilde
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQE9kXE1MQNuxza4YcERAstJAJ4lNIJevubKClBBNc+ILHwsM+QblACfehZB
> nwl/YbvZgx/6zNatp6DrrCw=
> =UsXY
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
--
--------------------- Ola Lundqvist ---------------------------
/ opal@debian.org Annebergsslingan 37 \
| opal@lysator.liu.se 654 65 KARLSTAD |
| +46 (0)54-10 14 30 +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
| http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 |
\ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
---------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to: