Re: Which Spam Block List to use for a network?

To: debian-isp@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Which Spam Block List to use for a network?
From: Mark Bucciarelli <mark@easymailings.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 10:32:35 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 200406241032.35116.mark@easymailings.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1088086175.4496.22.camel@ganymede.kk.de>
References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.21.0406241444130.8128-100000@student.dicea.unifi.it> <[🔎] 200406240915.10523.mark@easymailings.com> <[🔎] 1088086175.4496.22.camel@ganymede.kk.de>

On Thursday 24 June 2004 10:09, Kilian Krause wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> > For most cases, it doesn't cost anything to implement SPF now.  And if
> > you do it, and tell two friends, and they tell two friends ...
>
> well, this may be correct. However i miss the config sniplet to drop
> into exim4 in spf.pobox.com. So how do i make my MTA verify SPF?
> (setting up the DNS is easy enough, but i also want to check the others,
> wouldn't i? *g*)

http://spf.pobox.com/downloads.html

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Which Spam Block List to use for a network?
  - From: Leonardo Boselli <leo@dicea.unifi.it>
- Re: Which Spam Block List to use for a network?
  - From: Mark Bucciarelli <mark@easymailings.com>
- Re: Which Spam Block List to use for a network?
  - From: Kilian Krause <kk@verfaction.de>

Prev by Date: Re: Which Spam Block List to use for a network?
Next by Date: Using rblsmtpd and postmaster still receiving mail from all (even blacklisted) hosts
Previous by thread: Re: Which Spam Block List to use for a network?
Next by thread: Re: Which Spam Block List to use for a network?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread