Re: Which Spam Block List to use for a network?

To: debian-isp@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Which Spam Block List to use for a network?
From: Mark Bucciarelli <mark@easymailings.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 09:19:41 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 200406240919.41781.mark@easymailings.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20040624005136.GD4421@taz.net.au>
References: <[🔎] 20040618142958.GA19680@let.rug.nl> <[🔎] 763f93c804062308055d42391d@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 20040624005136.GD4421@taz.net.au>

On Wednesday 23 June 2004 20:51, Craig Sanders wrote:

> most ISPs (and mail service providers like yahoo and hotmail), for
> instance, will never have SPF records in their DNS.  they may use SPF
> checking on their own MX servers, but they won't have the records in
> their DNS.

Looks like you can use SPF with Hotmail since February.

"February 26th 2004: The latest version of Mail::SPF::Query will parse 
Caller-ID records! SPF-enabled MTAs can now read Hotmail and 
Microsoft.com's records and translate them into SPF format." [1]

Q: Do all hotmail accounts have Caller-ID records?

Regards,

Mark

[1] http://spf.pobox.com/

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Using rblsmtpd and postmaster still receiving mail from all (even blacklisted) hosts
  - From: "Jasper Metselaar" <jasper@formmailer.nl>
- Re: Which Spam Block List to use for a network?
  - From: Yves Junqueira <yves.junqueira@gmail.com>

References:
- Which Spam Block List to use for a network?
  - From: Francisco Borges <frandebo@latt.if.usp.br>
- Re: Which Spam Block List to use for a network?
  - From: Yves Junqueira <yves.junqueira@gmail.com>
- Re: Which Spam Block List to use for a network?
  - From: Craig Sanders <cas@taz.net.au>

Prev by Date: Re: Which Spam Block List to use for a network?
Next by Date: Re: Which Spam Block List to use for a network?
Previous by thread: Re: Which Spam Block List to use for a network?
Next by thread: Using rblsmtpd and postmaster still receiving mail from all (even blacklisted) hosts
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread