Re: Apache log analyzer
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 04:04:19PM +0200, Marcin Sochacki wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 08:33:53AM -0500, Steve Suehring wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 01:00:33PM +0300, Sami Haahtinen wrote:
> > > analog
> > > The only one that doesn't have packaging or application bugs, but then
> > > again, it lacks behind on features.
> >
> > Can you elaborate on the features that analog is missing?
>
> I'm not the original poster, but AFAIK Analog lacks an important feature
> i.e. incremental processing.
This is one of the features missing (the most important one)
> Replying to Sami: I think you've underestimated Webalizer's abilities.
> Sure, it's a bit old and the development seems to have stopped,
> but nevertheless it's a good program. I have no problems with Ignore
> statements. I really don't understand your point about indexes --
> can you elaborate on that?
the index page fog example broke at some point, i've been lazy and i
haven't worked though the actual bug on it. (it's not the only reason
why i'm not satisfied with webalizer though)
> Also, there is a very nice project based on Webalizer, which you didn't
> mention in your original post, namely Modlogan. I have fine-tuned my
> Webalizer setup for quite a long time now, so I'm unwilling to switch
> to another program, but if I had to choose, I would go for Modlogan.
Ooh, very nice.. This looks a bit more like it. Now, lets see of this
behaves better with my virtualhosts.
Thanks, Sami
--
-< Sami Haahtinen >-
-[ Notify immediately if you do not receive this message ]-
-< 2209 3C53 D0FB 041C F7B1 F908 A9B6 F730 B83D 761C >-
Reply to: