Re: SIGILL in __libc_csu_fini
On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 10:41:20AM +1000, Ian Wienand wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 12:33:26AM +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote:
> > I'm having some trouble with ghc6 on ia64 (this is not using the
> > packages, which also give SIGILL, but trying to crossport from x86
> > again.
>
> What versions of things are you using? I just installed both ghc6 and
> ghc-cvs packages on an I2, and apart from creating a 8MB executable
> file from my simple 10 line example both work fine.
>
> libc6.1 2.3.2.ds1-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone data
> ghc-cvs 20031220-3 GHC - the Glasgow Haskell Compilation system
> ghc6 6.2-3 GHC - the Glasgow Haskell Compilation system
> gcc 3.3.3-2 The GNU C compiler
>
Hmm, the same ones as you, of those you list. ghc6 should have beaten
ghc-cvs to /usr/bin/ghc.
unstable-igloo@merulo:~$ dpkg -l libc6.1 ghc-cvs ghc6 gcc
[...]
ii libc6.1 2.3.2.ds1-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone
pn ghc-cvs <none> (no description available)
ii ghc6 6.2-3 GHC - the Glasgow Haskell Compilation system
ii gcc 3.3.3-2 The GNU C compiler
unstable-igloo@merulo:~$ ghc
Illegal instruction
unstable-igloo@merulo:~$ ghc6
Illegal instruction
unstable-igloo@merulo:~$ which ghc
/usr/bin/ghc
unstable-igloo@merulo:~$ dpkg -S usr/bin/ghc
ghc6: /usr/bin/ghc6
ghc6: /usr/bin/ghci6
unstable-igloo@merulo:~$
I've put the complete dpkg -l output at
http://merulo.debian.org/~igloo/dpkg-l
> (might want to leave glibc list off, they have enough to worry about
> until we can prove it's a glibc bug)
Rightyho.
Thanks
Ian
Reply to: