[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Intent to NMU sugarplum to fix pending po-debconf l10n bugs



hi christian,

really strange coincidence, i kid you not--i was just importing the source 
packages into git as i recieved this.  updates should be heading to sid 
shortly.


	sean

On Wednesday 26 March 2008 07:53:12 pm Christian Perrier wrote:
> Dear Debian maintainer,
>
> The sugarplum Debian package, which you are the maintainer of, has
> pending bug report(s) which include translation updates or fixes
> for po-debconf, namely bug number 413784 (and maybe other similar bugs).
>
> Even if we're still far from the release of the next Debian version,
> letting such bugs sleep in the BTS  is simply lowering
> the chances that your package interaction with its users may be done
> in something else than the English language. It is also not
> encouraging for translators.
>
> I have the intention, as part of a more general action of the Debian
> i18n Task Force to build and possibly upload a non-maintainer upload
> for sugarplum in order to fix this as well as all pending translations
> for the debconf templates.
>
> Of course, an upload made by you would even be better...:-)
>
> Such changes are always harmless, which explains why I safely consider
> building NMU's for such issues even though they're obviously non critical.
>
> The schedule for the NMU (in case it happens, that is if you agree with it
> or if I don't receive any answer in 14 days) is roughly the following:
>
>  Wednesday, March 26, 2008   : send this notice
>  Wednesday, April 09, 2008       : post a NMU announcement to debian-i18n
> with you (maintainer) CC'ed
>  Saturday, April 19, 2008       : deadline for receiving translation
> updates Sunday, April 20, 2008       : build the package and upload it to
> DELAYED/2-day send the NMU patch to the BTS
>  Tuesday, April 22, 2008       : NMU reaches incoming
>
> If you intent to upload yourself, please notify me so that I interrupt
> the process on my side.
>
> In case I upload an NMU, I will subscribe to the Package Tracking System
> for sugarplum and follow its life for 60 days after my NMU in order to fix
> any issue potentially introduced by my upload.
>
> Let me know, as soon as possible, if you have any kind of objection to this
> process.
>
> If you'd rather do the fix yourself, I will of course leave the package
> alone. Same if you have reasons not to do the update now.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Reply to: