Re: http://www.debian.org/intl/l10n/ popularity sorting?

[Jacob Sparre Andersen <sparre@nbi.dk>]

Denis Barbier wrote:

> At the moment, only one sorting order is allowed for all 
> materials, and fixing that may be quite hard,

>  http://people.debian.org/~barbier/intl/l10n/unstable/ If 
> you prefer this sorting order, I will grab by_vote instead 
> of by_inst, please have a look and let me know.

I prefer this sorting order, since the packages hopefully 
are used more often than they are installed.

Would it make sense to put untranslated and partially 
translated packages in the same table?  From the point of 
making the individual programs appear more consistent (in a 
single language), partially translated packages are special. 
On the other hand, from the point of view of getting the 
most used texts translated first, there is no point in 
distinguishing between untranslated and partially translated 
packages.  I am not sure which of these two points of view 
should have the highest priority.

Jacob
--
"It ain't rocket science!"