Re: Potential issues for most ports (Was: Re: Bits from the Release Team (Jessie freeze info))
Niels Thykier writes ("Re: Potential issues for most ports (Was: Re: Bits from the Release Team (Jessie freeze info))"):
> On 2013-11-03 16:03, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> > http://udd.debian.org/bugs.cgi?release=jessie_or_sid&merged=ign&fnewerval=7&kfreebsd=1&sortby=severity&sorto=desc&cseverity=1&ctags=1
>
> Actually, I meant a "real" BTS page (e.g. like [1]) rather than "just" a
> list of tagged bugs. The list of tagged bugs definitely have it uses,
> but it does not give me an overview of which bugs should be fixed by the
> maintainer of the given package and which the porters should fix.
I think this would be a good idea. If the psuedo-package had a
predictable name which depended only on the architecture, even better.
Ian.
Reply to: