Re: Toolchain TLS support
- To: "Alfred M. Szmidt" <ams@gnu.org>
- Cc: tschwinge@gnu.org, bug-hurd@gnu.org, aurel32@debian.org, hurd-devel@gnu.org, debian-hurd@lists.debian.org, debian-glibc@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Toolchain TLS support
- From: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>
- Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 18:57:09 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20060905165709.GA4403@implementation.residence.ens-lyon.fr>
- Mail-followup-to: "Alfred M. Szmidt" <ams@gnu.org>, tschwinge@gnu.org, bug-hurd@gnu.org, aurel32@debian.org, hurd-devel@gnu.org, debian-hurd@lists.debian.org, debian-glibc@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20060905104412.7140344005@Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE>
- References: <44EF7E89.2050808@debian.org> <[🔎] 20060905083854.GL5278@fencepost> <[🔎] 20060905090512.2D76244009@Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE> <[🔎] 20060905093550.GM5278@fencepost> <[🔎] 20060905095708.5752444005@Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE> <[🔎] 20060905101828.GH4461@implementation.labri.fr> <[🔎] 20060905104412.7140344005@Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE>
Alfred M. Szmidt, le Tue 05 Sep 2006 12:44:12 +0200, a écrit :
> > As I said, these patches will become avaiable with time. But as
> > such, both GCC and GLIBC work fine on GNU; you are of course free
> > to inisist on otherwise if that makes you happy.
>
> By "as such", do you mean "upstream glibc 2.4 release and gcc 4.1",
> or your patched versions?
>
> That is a trick question,
There is no trick here.
> glibc hasn't worked out of the box for
> atleast a year since malloc/memusage.c uses __thread without #if's.
Ok so glibc 2.4 as such doesn't work (that was the original question).
Samuel
Reply to: