[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Transition of packages in git repos



Hi.

Excerpts from Joachim Breitner's message of Sex Abr 08 07:17:09 -0300 2011:
(...)
> Some of them are in git repositories (e.g. ConfigFile), and I’m not motivated
> to remember the exact steps for those.

Maybe it's time to raise the two VCS versus one VCS discussion again.  PET is
only available for darcs, there are considerably more packages in darcs than in
git[0], and it's not cool indeed to have to remember two procedures.  Not only
remember, but actually writing two build scripts, since I, and probably others,
do everything using shell scripts.

The whole purpose of the groups is to make easier the handle of a group of
packages, and this is achieved by keeping things homogenous.  Most library
packages have a common debian directory, and it would be very good if we could
work with all DHG packages with the same procedure.

So, asking again, is anyone against using darcs for all (the debian dir of) DHG
packages?

Greetings.

0:
marcot@zezinho:~$ ssh darcs.debian.org ls /darcs/pkg-haskell | wc -l
220
marcot@zezinho:~$ ssh git.debian.org ls /git/pkg-haskell | wc -l
16
(...)
-- 
marcot
http://marcot.eti.br/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: