sid: gtk2 apps segfault
Hi,
after having updated to the latest sid, some GTK+2 applications (gaim
and gtk-demo) segfault at start through an ssh session. I didn't try
directly at the machine, because my computer is remote-only for today.
Gaim's bt:
(gdb) bt
#0 0x41422f1a in gtk_icon_source_get_type () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#1 0x41422e46 in gtk_icon_source_free () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#2 0x410dc8d7 in IceAcceptConnection () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libICE.so.6
#3 0x46c07d3f in g_type_free_instance () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#4 0x46c09471 in g_type_class_ref () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#5 0x46bf1338 in g_object_newv () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#6 0x46bf170e in g_object_new_valist () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#7 0x46bf0b96 in g_object_new () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#8 0x41555656 in gtk_window_new () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#9 0x080fdbd2 in gaim_gtk_stock_init ()
#10 0x080fc360 in sighandler ()
#11 0x0807c4c4 in gaim_core_init ()
#12 0x080fc95e in main ()
gtk-demo's bt:
#0 0x410dc770 in ?? ()
#1 0x415546ce in gtk_window_get_type () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#2 0x46c07d3f in g_type_free_instance () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#3 0x46c09471 in g_type_class_ref () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#4 0x46bf1338 in g_object_newv () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#5 0x46bf170e in g_object_new_valist () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#6 0x46bf0b96 in g_object_new () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#7 0x41555656 in gtk_window_new () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#8 0x0805a01e in ?? ()
#9 0x00000000 in ?? ()
#10 0xbffffae4 in ?? ()
etc.
Gossip's bt:
(gdb) bt
#0 0x414566ec in gtk_menu_reorder_child () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#1 0x411800f3 in gnome_program_postinit () from /usr/lib/libgnome-2.so.0
#2 0x41180590 in gnome_program_initv () from /usr/lib/libgnome-2.so.0
#3 0x41180179 in gnome_program_init () from /usr/lib/libgnome-2.so.0
#4 0x0806aa40 in main ()
and so on. Strangely enough, epiphany doesn't segfault.
Any hint ?
Xav
Reply to: