Oh i like the idea of libexec, don't get me wrong. But right now debian packages with stuff in libexec is wrong. * Jeff Waugh (jdub@perkypants.org) wrote: > <quote who="Eric Dorland"> > > > Err, libexec isn't in th FHS, so things shouldn't be put in there, it > > would be against policy. > > Upstream puts them there given that they should not be user-executable. > libexec will go into FHS at some stage; you guys will have to work something > out in the mean time. ;-) > > - Jeff > -- Eric Dorland <dorland@lords.com> ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: hooty@jabber.com 1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6 -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GCS d- s++: a-- C+++ UL+++ P++ L++ E++ W++ N+ o K- w+ O? M++ V-- PS+ PE Y+ PGP++ t++ 5++ X+ R tv++ b+++ DI+ D+ G e h! r- y+ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Attachment:
pgp7kyFc2zVxt.pgp
Description: PGP signature