Re: GNOME 1.4 Status
>>>>> On 14 Apr 2001 10:22:29 -0500, epg@pobox.com (Eric Gillespie, Jr.) said:
Eric> The maintainers of gtop and python-gnome have spoken up and
Eric> said that they will upload new versions, so i'll leave them
Eric> alone. bug-buddy appears to be under control as well, but i'm
Eric> not sure yet. I'll post its status soon.
Eric> Furthermore, Martin Bialasinski has given me the task-gnome-*
Eric> packages. I will roll new meta-packages along the lines i
Eric> mentioned in my original message and post them here for
Eric> comments before uploading. I will then ask that task-gnome-* be
Eric> removed from the archive. I could really use suggestions for
Eric> what to call the gnome-games and gnome-network meta-packages,
Eric> since there are already packages with those names.
They should be called task-gnome-* packages. Isn't that the point of
task-* packages? Why do you want to rename them to something else?
Jim
--
@James LewisMoss <dres@debian.org> | Blessed Be!
@ http://jimdres.home.mindspring.com | Linux is kewl!
@"Argue for your limitations and sure enough, they're yours." Bach
Reply to: