[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1070666: marked as done (util-linux: last(1) is broken on i386 since 2.40-8)



Your message dated Thu, 16 May 2024 22:08:32 +0200
with message-id <[🔎] ZkZnwErOJo3AiANm@per>
and subject line Re: Bug#1070666: util-linux: last(1) is broken on i386 since 2.40-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #1070666,
regarding util-linux: last(1) is broken on i386 since 2.40-8
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1070666: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1070666
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: util-linux
Version: 2.40-8
Severity: normal

 Hello.

 Upgrade of util-linux from 2.39.3-6 to 2.40-8 on i386 systems breaks
 last(1), while the same upgrade on amd64 systems does not break it.
 Examples on my hosts running in 32-bit mode:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
root@citrine # /usr/bin/last -3
last: unrecognized ut_type: 22985
last: preallocation size exceeded

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
root@typhoon # /usr/bin/last -3
last: unrecognized ut_type: 3640
last: unrecognized ut_type: 52
6.5.0-1- 3                             Thu Jan  1 03:00    gone - no logout
last: unrecognized ut_type: -14908
amd64    evel                          Sat Jul  6 11:21 - down  (586103921+18:44)
last: preallocation size exceeded

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
root@passat # /usr/bin/last -3
last: unrecognized ut_type: -13985
last: unrecognized ut_type: 53
6.5.0-1- 2                             Thu Jan  1 03:00    gone - no logout
last: unrecognized ut_type: 15714
last: unrecognized ut_type: -4407
amd64    evel                          Sat Jul  6 11:21    gone - no logout
last: unrecognized ut_type: -31324
last: unrecognized ut_type: 29555
6.5.0-1- b9                            Thu Jan  1 03:00    gone - no logout
last: unrecognized ut_type: 2583
last: unrecognized ut_type: 29556
last: unrecognized ut_type: -18676
last: unrecognized ut_type: 19843
last: unrecognized ut_type: 14690
192.168. ts/9root                      Thu Jan  1 03:00    gone - no logout
last: preallocation size exceeded

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

 Running binary extracted from util-linux 2.39.3-6 package (as /tmp/last)
 always produce right results:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
root@citrine # /tmp/last -3
root     pts/9        192.168.27.27    Mon May  6 22:40   still logged in
root     pts/9        192.168.27.7     Mon May  6 10:19 - 13:20  (03:01)
root     pts/10       192.168.27.17    Fri May  3 16:12 - 19:10  (02:57)

wtmp begins Sun Apr 14 11:18:49 2024
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

 Package info:
 
||/ Name           Version      Architecture Description
+++-==============-============-============-=================================
ii  util-linux     2.40-8       i386         miscellaneous system utilities
ii  libc-bin       2.37-18      i386         GNU C Library: Binaries
ii  libc-l10n      2.37-18      all          GNU C Library: localization files
ii  libc6:i386     2.37-18      i386         GNU C Library: Shared libraries

-- 
 Eugene Berdnikov

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
fixed 1070666 glibc/2.38-7
thanks

Hi,

On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 10:46:28PM +0300, Eugene Berdnikov wrote:
>  Installation of util-linux 2.40.1-1 (and accompanied libmount1,
>  libuuid1, libblkid1, libsmartcols1 of the same version) solves
>  the problem, output of "last" is correct.

Thanks for reporting back with the good news!

>  Thank you, guys!

Chris

--- End Message ---

Reply to: