[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#91311: semid_ds conflicts with SUSv2



On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 10:00:02AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:

> So did the prior error occur from this issue?  Or I guess it's
> something other things which is already fixed in these days...

What prior error?  If you mean the build failures due to this then they
were introduced with glibc 2.1 or 2.2 and are still present in glibc
2.3.

> TenDRA things are still "workaround" state, but at least I think glibc
> definition satisfies your requirement, linux definition and the
> standards (not strictly, but some degree).  Could I close this bug?

Nothing has changed since the bug was reported - I'd say leave it open.
It's always possible someone will come along and implement a standard
conforming wrapper.

-- 
"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."

Attachment: pgpkcSqeCk7Y3.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: