Re: [DebianGIS] osgearth and tinyows
- To: Aron Xu <happyaron.xu@gmail.com>
- Cc: Pirmin Kalberer <pi_deb@sourcepole.ch>, Francesco Paolo Lovergine <frankie@debian.org>, debian-gis@lists.debian.org, YunQiang Su <wzssyqa@gmail.com>, cavallini@faunalia.it
- Subject: Re: [DebianGIS] osgearth and tinyows
- From: "Francesco P. Lovergine" <frankie@debian.org>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 18:11:56 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20110713161156.GB4268@blegrez.ba.issia.cnr.it>
- Mail-followup-to: Aron Xu <happyaron.xu@gmail.com>, Pirmin Kalberer <pi_deb@sourcepole.ch>, Francesco Paolo Lovergine <frankie@debian.org>, debian-gis@lists.debian.org, YunQiang Su <wzssyqa@gmail.com>, cavallini@faunalia.it
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] CAMr=8w66nTnQUV-xS2xKwMYrv=L2eq0jNfHUVWMMKyXOEDEktg@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <[🔎] vmu59gm40e9xbao603bmcdq5.1310203412708@email.android.com> <[🔎] 201107120933.39176.pi_deb@sourcepole.ch> <[🔎] 4E1C25EF.3090403@gmail.com> <[🔎] 201107122259.36062.pi_deb@sourcepole.ch> <[🔎] CAMr=8w6q1mLO=zt=OcK-T2mGbSi2F7S_SxX97DxJAdHONHygUg@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] CAMr=8w66nTnQUV-xS2xKwMYrv=L2eq0jNfHUVWMMKyXOEDEktg@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 11:54:55PM +0800, Aron Xu wrote:
> > OK, so I tried to build it in an up-to-date i386 sid chroot, but it
> > appears libgdal1-dev in Build-Depends cannot be satisfied because it
> > depends on libhdf4-alt-dev and libhdf5-seial-dev. libgdal1-dev itself
> > is depending on the obsolete libjpeg62-dev, and the latter two are
> > depending on libjpeg-dev, which results into depending on libjpeg8-dev
> > now. libjpeg62-dev and libjpeg8-dev are conflicts with each other. The
> > solution is we have to update the package src:gdal first... I'll
> > prepare a team upload for it to get rid of it from our way.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Aron Xu
> >
>
> Well... I see there is an experimental version of gdal already, but I
> think I should update the version in unstable first, and let frankie
> to continue in the future.
>
Yep, right. We need to update both 1.7 and 1.8.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
Reply to: