Bug#666743: gcc-for-host fixes

[Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>]

On 10/18/20 5:35 PM, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Hi Matthias,
> 
> a while ago, you reviewed my last patch iteration and had a few remarks.
> This is a summary of the remaining issues.
> 
> In https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=666743#65, you
> complained about linking the doc directory of the new triple-suffixed
> gdc package to the base package. In subsequent mails, I detailed why I
> think this is not a problem.
> 
> In https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=666743#70, you
> complained about missing package in dpkg-genchanges. This is due to a
> wrong Architecture field fixed in 0001 attached. Thanks.
> 
> In https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=666743#85, you
> complained about a loosely versioned dependeny on gdc fixed in 0002
> attached. Thanks.
> 
> Thus this mail covers all remaining issues with two patches. I've based
> them on your gcc-host branch as requested.

thanks!

I don't want to apply those for the package in unstable, before we have the
corresponding gcc-defaults package ready.  Not saying that we can't do it before
the bullseye freeze, but maybe we should start with this for GCC 11.

Starting with GCC 11 would allow us to drop the separate builds, and just use
the symlink approach consistently for gdc and gnat.

Matthias