Bug#186299: optimization/10315: [3.2/3.3 regression] [powerpc] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2175
- To: David Edelsohn <dje@watson.ibm.com>
- Cc: Geoff Keating <geoffk@geoffk.org>, s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, adconrad@0c3.net, 186299@bugs.debian.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
- Subject: Bug#186299: optimization/10315: [3.2/3.3 regression] [powerpc] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2175
- From: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 15:50:43 -0700
- Message-id: <20030423225043.GI24723@redhat.com>
- Mail-followup-to: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>, David Edelsohn <dje@watson.ibm.com>, Geoff Keating <geoffk@geoffk.org>, s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, adconrad@0c3.net, 186299@bugs.debian.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
- Reply-to: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>, 186299@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <200304232009.QAA31218@makai.watson.ibm.com>
- References: <200304231814.h3NIEQi26263@desire.geoffk.org> <200304232009.QAA31218@makai.watson.ibm.com>
On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 04:09:59PM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
> GCC probably should not fall on its face when presented with this
> type of error, but I am not sure who sure ensure a valid insn.
> gen_move_insn() should not be called that late?
This is the same as PR8300, which I am looking at today.
r~
Reply to: