>the current 2.95.4 doesn't builf on s390, but 2.95.3, so it might be >necessary to add a reverse-diff (for woody as well). Is there any bug open for this? I couldn't find one from a quick look at the lists for gcc and gcc-2.95. In any case I don't think we have to worry about it for potato -- there's no support for s390 at all in that distribution, is there? Thanks for the link to your pre-2.95.3 package, I'll take a look at it. p.
Attachment:
pgpISOB05iQ05.pgp
Description: PGP signature