[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[no subject]



2 years ago, Markus Sabadello wrote a great answer to the earlier
question about running an ethereum node on the FreedomBox.
https://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/freedombox-discuss/2015-November/006998.html

I suppose my response would've been similar.

Seems like the main problem would be that Ethereum is really resource
hungry to be able to run on Single Board Computers.
https://ethereum.stackexchange.com/questions/27360/ethereum-node-hardware-requirements

The documentation on Whisper says:
"It was designed to provide resilience and privacy at considerable
expense. At its most secure mode of operation, Whisper can theoretically
deliver 100% darkness."

The 4th use case on this page seems relevant to FreedomBox.
https://github.com/ethereum/wiki/wiki/Whisper

I'm new to smart contracts and DApps and don't fully understand how to
use this for anonymous communications yet. I found one DApp Demo called
Whisper Chat Client.
https://www.stateofthedapps.com/dapps/whisper-chat-client
Maybe there will be further improvements in the future.

We should approach this on a use case basis and also see if there are
cheaper solutions for the same use case. I understand the pain that
there's currently no email server on the FreedomBox.

BTW, there's a new decentralized network which recently caught my
attention, called ZeroNet which offers email, forums, blogs and other
communication platforms but is light-weight enough to run on a
FreedomBox running on a SBC.
https://zeronet.readthedocs.io/en/latest/

--

Regards,

Joseph Nuthalapati

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/freedombox-discuss/attachments/20171112/1c11f5ce/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/freedombox-discuss/attachments/20171112/1c11f5ce/attachment.sig>


Reply to: