On Thu, 23 Sep 2021, Nathan Willis wrote:
> the next-best option, I wonder if there might be some concern with blanket
> rewriting that entry in the [OS/2] table. For example, I think that might
I agree that this is a definite no-go.
Along those lines, if there _is_ a font with an uninstallability or unembeddability condition in this OS/2 entry, but for which the license statement claims no such restriction, is that considered a contradiction (and, thus, the contradiction would be considered a bug in its own right)?
The easy corner case there might be a font under CC0 / public-domain-declaration.
Norbert, I would be curious if there is any considered opinion on that question from the TeX community, which has surely grappled with embeddability and such for a lengthier period of time (in a non-OFL+RFN context).
Nate
--