[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Tight firewall settings? (I50external.rul)



Hi,

I've just set up my firewall settings. I think they're already pretty 
tight, but I'd like to make them as tight as possible without breaking 
things.

There is one line in I50external.rul that I don't fully understand. If I 
remove that line I can't get into the internet anymore. This is the 
config file, the questionnable line is the last one:

	    # Allow only some packets from external hosts to ports 0..1023
	    $IPCHAINS -A input -j ACCEPT -i $i -p TCP -d $IPOFIF/32 ftp
	    $IPCHAINS -A input -j ACCEPT -i $i -p TCP -d $IPOFIF/32 ftp-data
	    $IPCHAINS -A input -j ACCEPT -i $i -p TCP -d $IPOFIF/32 ssh
	    $IPCHAINS -A input -j ACCEPT -i $i -p UDP -d $IPOFIF/32 ssh
	    $IPCHAINS -A input -j ACCEPT -i $i -p TCP -d $IPOFIF/32 smtp
	    $IPCHAINS -A input -j ACCEPT -i $i -p TCP -d $IPOFIF/32 www
	    $IPCHAINS -A input -j ACCEPT -i $i -p UDP -d $IPOFIF/32 www
	    $IPCHAINS -A input -j ACCEPT -i $i -p UDP \
      -s safe.host.de       -d $IPOFIF/32 snmp -l
    	    $IPCHAINS -A input -j ACCEPT -i $i -p UDP \
      -s safe.host.de       -d $IPOFIF/32 snmp-trap -l
    	    $IPCHAINS -A input -j ACCEPT -i $i -p UDP \
      -s safe.host.de       -d $IPOFIF/32 syslog


	    # Deny packets to ports 0..1023 that haven't been explicitly
	    # allowed in previous rules
	    $IPCHAINS -A input -j DENY -i $i -p TCP -d $IPOFIF/32 0:1023
	    $IPCHAINS -A input -j DENY -i $i -p UDP -d $IPOFIF/32 0:1023

	    # Allow all remaining packets from external hosts to firewall host
	    # that haven't been matched by a previous rule
    # 
    $IPCHAINS -A input -j ACCEPT -i $i -d $IPOFIF/32

My default policy is to "DENY" everything.

Why do I need the last line?

Thanks,

Ralf


-- 
Sign the EU petition against SPAM:          L I N U X       .~.
http://www.politik-digital.de/spam/        The  Choice      /V\
                                            of a  GNU      /( )\
                                           Generation      ^^-^^



Reply to: