On Thu,06.Nov.08, 23:11:48, Giovanni Rapagnani wrote: > On 05/11/08 00:56, LaMont Jones wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 10:43:08PM +0100, Giovanni Rapagnani wrote: >>> Dear Jones, >> LaMont, actually... > Sorry, LaMont. > >>> "when dist-upgrading to lenny, the upgrade of mount fails if there >>> are NFS filesystems mounted. The new version of mount requires that nfs-common >>> be upgraded before NFS mounts will work. This is then solved by umounting NFS >>> mounts before upgrading." >> >> This is maybe a bit more specific... And yes, it should definitely be >> in the release notes. >> >> lamont >> >> ..., the upgrade of mount fails if there are NFS filesystems mounted, and >> nfs-common is out-of-date. Either upgrade nfs-common, or unmount any >> NFS mounts prior to upgrading mount. > > Thank you for the correction. > Martin, I think this should be added in section 5.3 of the release-notes, > the whole text becoming then: > > "Since util-linux 2.13 NFS mounts are no longer handled by util-linux > itself, but by nfs-common. Since not all systems mount NFS shares and to > avoid a standard portmapper installation util-linux only suggests ^^^ Comma? Regards, Andrei -- If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough. (Albert Einstein)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature