Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures

[rhys <rhys@neoquasar.org>]

Let me try again, following up on the previous thread, but removing most of the irrelevant history.

If I have a 32-bit Intel system that is currently supported on bookworm (currently running bullseye, but I can upgrade it), is that of use to anyone as a native build platform for 32-bit binary packages for Debian?

--J

> On Jan 12, 2024, at 12:06, Alan Corey <alan01346@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Are you forgetting that 64 bit is slower?  In the arm world where it's easily switchable 64 bit is pokey when you don't need it.
>