Re: Control header sent with done email didn't do what I expected, should it have?

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Control header sent with done email didn't do what I expected, should it have?
From: Jonathan Kamens <jik@kamens.us>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2023 10:54:31 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 13cd56ab-5019-4b0f-888c-c2a9c37d8732@kamens.us>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] ZRGe0rmD-ANIf4bs@durkon.wrar.name>
References: <[🔎] 7396980d-4eb3-4ad6-8488-fda05b9566eb@kamens.us> <[🔎] ZRGe0rmD-ANIf4bs@durkon.wrar.name>

Thank you! A canonical answer at last.

On 9/25/23 10:53, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:

On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 07:16:56AM -0400, Jonathan Kamens wrote:

I recently tried to close a bug, explain why, and set a "wontfix" tag all at
once by sending my explanation to ###-done@bugs.debian.org with "Control:
tags ### wontfix" as the first line of my message body. The bug was closed
but the tags command wasn't processed.

It doesn't work for NNN-done@ according to
https://www.donarmstrong.com/posts/control_at_submit/

Reply to:

References:
- Control header sent with done email didn't do what I expected, should it have?
  - From: Jonathan Kamens <jik@kamens.us>
- Re: Control header sent with done email didn't do what I expected, should it have?
  - From: Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@wrar.name>

Prev by Date: Re: Control header sent with done email didn't do what I expected, should it have?
Next by Date: Re: Control header sent with done email didn't do what I expected, should it have?
Previous by thread: Re: Control header sent with done email didn't do what I expected, should it have?
Next by thread: Re: Control header sent with done email didn't do what I expected, should it have?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread