On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 10:56:03PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote: > > what about cdebootstrap? > cdebootstrap (and mmdebstrap) never implemented a merging step[1] and to > this date rely on the usrmerge package doing it at postinst time. Once > base-files ships the aliasing symlinks, both will produce /usr-merged > trees without any modifications. The reason that we need a change to > debootstrap is that its current merging implementation breaks when > base-files ships aliasing symlinks. > > So the main reason for doing this change to debootstrap is that it > enables us to continue supporting cdebootstrap and mmdebstrap without > any changes there. ah, thank you! -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C ⠈⠳⣄ Just because other people are also responsible, does not mean you are not responsible.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature