[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: dh_auto_test fails and I do not understand why



Greetings, Niels,

On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 10:59:10AM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
Andrius Merkys:
Hello,

On 2022-12-15 11:20, Filippo Rusconi wrote:
I have uploaded a package yesterday. That package does not have any dh_auto_test
target in d/rules.

The builds all fail, as described here:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=minexpert2
and I do not understand why.
Any soul to help me with this question?

I have just stumbled on the same while building a new package with javahelper:

install: cannot change owner and permissions of ‘debian/_jh_build.lucene9-9.4.2’: Operation not permitted jh_build: error: install -m0755 -o 0 -g 0 -d debian/_jh_build.lucene9-9.4.2 returned exit code 1

However, I have no idea why '-o 0 -g 0' options are used. They do not seem to be used before.

Andrius


Long story short:

* Bug in fakeroot (#1023286 + #1024544)
* Me thinking it was a bug in debhelper so I tried to fix it
  (which did not work and broke on the way in)
* Me realizing it was a bug in fakeroot and my change did not
  even function as a work around, so I undid it (it broke on
  the way out as well).

And the winners are: All the people that have (and are) able to use "Rules-Requires-Root: no" as packages with that flag would have been
completely unaffected by this entire ordeal!

Your options include:

* Migrate to "Rules-Requires-Root: no" if you can
* Ensure you have debhelper (>= 13.11.3~) ("just uploaded") or
  debhelper/13.11.1 (or debhelper << 13.11)

I will now go back to looking more at my prototype for getting even more packages buildable with "Rules-Requires-Root: no".

Thank you so much for the explanation. I'll go the Rules-Requires-Root: no
route!

Sincerely,
Filippo

--

⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀  Filippo Rusconi, PhD
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁   Research scientist at CNRS
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀   Debian Developer
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀  http://msxpertsuite.org
          http://www.debian.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: