On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 12:25:36AM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > I agree with Stephan's and Sam's reasoning, I think the detailed > information should be in the devref. > > A wiki is by definition open to edition by any (authorized?) user; the > devref has named editors (as you are very well aware ;-) ) and can be > seen as verified and curated information. I think the information > should be concisely explained in the devref, leaving the Wiki for more > full/detailed information on specific points, examples, or documenting > changes as they are discussed or implemented, Ok, thanks for your feedback, Gunnar, Sam, Stephan & Jochen! I'll take this route soon. > while waiting for them > to arrive to the devref's next edition. fwiw, I've switched the release modell of src:developers-reference to 'release early, release often', which means I basically aim to release directly after each substancial change. By looking at the version number in bullseye, which is 11.0.21, you can easily see this ment I did 21 uploads in the two years of developing bullseye. (This poses challenges to translations to say the least, which I plan to address eventually.) More help (best in form of patches or commits) absolutly very welcome! Any member of the Debian group on salsa can and should commit freely & with responsibility :) -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C ⠈⠳⣄ People call vaccine mandates "Orwellian" even though Orwell died at 46 of tuberculosis, which is now preventable with a vaccine.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature