Re: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/dballe
- To: Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org>
- Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/dballe
- From: Wouter Verhelst <wouter@debian.org>
- Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2020 17:48:13 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20200113154813.GA14466@grep.be>
- In-reply-to: <CAKTje6ErgKsxx=Qx96UMoCwys81JyQ_4iu23j_XgXv5UT7eK0A@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <20191229085244.wvf3y6cgigpdg5uc@enricozini.org> <7fd9f32e-7d7e-c548-e78f-b3cf438b6951@debian.org> <CAKTje6ErgKsxx=Qx96UMoCwys81JyQ_4iu23j_XgXv5UT7eK0A@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 02:47:45AM +0000, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 11:32 AM Paul Gevers wrote:
>
> > [1] Source packages that build binaries unknown to the archive currently
> > need these binaries to be uploaded by the maintainers for reviewing by
> > ftp-master in NEW. IIRC there have been multiple proposals to avoid
> > these binaries from either being needed or being uploaded to the Debian
> > archive, but so far the current tooling requires this.
>
> There has been some recent work on this part of the problem, I
> focussed on throwing away binaries for all sourceful uploads and ivodd
> focussed on doing that for NEW uploads only. Since ivodd's patch is
> further along than mine, I hope he will extend it to all sourceful
> uploads.
You'll make it unnecessarily harder to bootstrap environments that need
themselves to build if you do that.
Throwing it away for NEW makes sense, but not for regular uploads, IMO.
--
To the thief who stole my anti-depressants: I hope you're happy
-- seen somewhere on the Internet on a photo of a billboard
Reply to: