[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Can I suppress automatic creation of -dbgsym packages?



Hi Niels,

Thanks for the prompt and detailed answer!  It addressed all my questions.

On 20 December 2015 at 21:11, Niels Thykier wrote:
| Dirk Eddelbuettel:
| > I was just updating one of my several dozen r-cran-* packages. These all use
| > the same (source) r-cran.mk script shipped with the main R packages.
| > 
| > And now all of sudden it wants to build a -dbgsym package.
| > 
| > That may not be such a good idea for the several hundred r-cran-* packages.
| > I have been looking around the Deverloper Reference and Wiki (plus Google
| > searches) but not found a way to suppress this.  What am I missing?
[...]
| Please have a look at [1].  Though if your reason for disabling them are:
| 
|  * Upload speed / personal bandwidth costs.
|    - Then please consider using "source-only" (or arch:all+source)
|      uploads, which is unaffected and keeps the dbgsym.
| 
|  * That they take up a lot of mirror space etc.
|    - Then please keep in mind that they are off-loaded to a separate
|      mirror network and therefore will not burden users / developers
|      except those who explicitly enable them.
| 
|  * If you have other concerns with them, please let me know. :)
| 
| At the same time, the dbgsym packages can be used to assist debugging
| your packages or retracing coredumps.  They will also be available from
| snapshot.debian.org, so you can retrace coredumps from previous uploads
| as long as they had a dbgsym package.

Thanks a bunch. The link below did fix it. I had just setup a test
environment in Docker and the env.var will do.

I think will patch the 'debian/rules snippet' we ship with r-base-core to
instruct dh_strip to not create these for now.  _Right now_ we end up with
Lintian errrors hence my first gut instinct to suppress this. The -dbg
packages are a good idea; I provide them as eg r-base-core-dbg and for the
GSL etc.  These may make sense for R packages too, but the r-cran.mk snippet
needs some work to postprocess what dh_gencontrol et al create. Volunteers?

Dirk

| ~Niels
| 
| [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2015/12/msg00262.html
| 
| 
| 
| x[DELETED ATTACHMENT signature.asc, application/pgp-signature]

-- 
http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | edd@debian.org


Reply to: