Le 04/05/12 00:29, Peter Samuelson a écrit : > > [Patrick Lauer] >> 1.0_pre20120503 maybe > > That'd be wrong if you expect a real _alpha, _beta or _pre of the given > version in the future. I think in that case you'd need something like > 1.0_alpha_alpha20120503 or 1.0_alpha_pre20120503. > 1.0~git20120503 would also break if upstream, later, releases 1.0~alpha. Regards, Thibaut.