El 12/1/19 a les 16:15, Stephen Kitt ha escrit: > Hi Leopold, > > On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 15:42:31 +0100, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda > <leo@alaxarxa.net> wrote: >> El 12/1/19 a les 13:11, Gianfranco Costamagna ha escrit: >>> hello, you should fix build failures *before* uploading to unstable, not >>> after... >>> this makes the transition look bad, and release team sad. >> >> yes, I built ALL the packages that depend of libode-dev with the package >> in experimental. As ALL the packages built without any problem I did a >> bug to release team #918987 asking for a transition slot. >> >> After that release team gave me a green light I push it to unstable. >> >> That was the procedure you asked? Is it ok to you to looks good? ;-) > > I suspect Gianfranco is referring to > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=ode — your upload fails to > build on most architectures. Ideally, a transition is prepared in > experimental before going to unstable; this allows the builds to be verified > and avoids breaking unstable. > Hi Stephen and Gianfranco, your message made me go to a nightmare yesterday. I have to admit that I didn't checked the build logs. Upstream told me that there wasn't important changes and I was more worried because about that, all the packages that use ode were built without problems. I didn't notice any strange thing in my amd64 box so I concentrate in the procedure verifying the dependencies. But I was wrong ... It seems that upstream did some asserts that broke in a non common archs and also some autotest failed, so the problem grow up. I sent an email to upstream but in the middle, yesterday night (some hours after your email) I pushed a new version of the package solving the issue in some archs (disabling autotest) and upstream send a patch to solve the main problem. Thanks also to the people of #debian-mentors. This morning I have pushed a new version of the package and now it's built in all the arch except ia64, but because dependencies. Still remains a small fix in one define but I would like what happens this week. I'm sorry for the noise. Best regards, Leopold -- -- Linux User 152692 GPG: 05F4A7A949A2D9AA Catalonia ------------------------------------- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature