Accepted rocblas 5.3.3+dfsg-2 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 03 Jun 2023 10:40:57 -0600
Source: rocblas
Architecture: source
Version: 5.3.3+dfsg-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: ROCm Team <debian-ai@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Cordell Bloor <cgmb@slerp.xyz>
Changes:
rocblas (5.3.3+dfsg-2) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Migrate to unstable.
* Add d/p/0012-expand-isa-compatibility.patch to enable experimental
support for gfx902, gfx909, gfx90c, gfx1011, gfx1031, gfx1032,
gfx1033, gfx1034, gfx1035 and gfx1036 when combined with
rocr-runtime 5.2.3-4~exp1 and rocm-hipamd 5.2.3-10~exp1.
* Add 0011-disable-stdc-extension-in-header.patch to fix inconsistent
behaviour depending on order of inclusion of rocblas headers.
* Add d/p/0013-disable-rotg-nan-check.patch and
d/p/0014-fixup-backported-tests.patch to fix rotg tests.
* d/copyright: fix typo
Checksums-Sha1:
dbb25b279e2d65ec083dd955ec07381aa4e2d941 2583 rocblas_5.3.3+dfsg-2.dsc
9e205755f4dfbc5f4ac3f163368e7090eb4c6d4f 341092 rocblas_5.3.3+dfsg-2.debian.tar.xz
ffeb4e03404aa561a39f14db9d909a31329a20ad 6585 rocblas_5.3.3+dfsg-2_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
65ffd217c7a9b14b4d2357506809bfbc0fd40e7d49fac50a3f2dda5b9cc39c98 2583 rocblas_5.3.3+dfsg-2.dsc
a1870e661e1bb484183ef1dcbe9884a3673a0682297d7afeab240a6a808065eb 341092 rocblas_5.3.3+dfsg-2.debian.tar.xz
555b5514989b5b0b1d15af4d9bf4ec90e1c634df0daf076e98a6cdef1c54e46d 6585 rocblas_5.3.3+dfsg-2_source.buildinfo
Files:
20b605347aa7a884e8f367a24a2f6323 2583 devel optional rocblas_5.3.3+dfsg-2.dsc
76dd2bd1d4a9c1db7772b008bcec82c6 341092 devel optional rocblas_5.3.3+dfsg-2.debian.tar.xz
5b0f2f14d9c2baa6d8da384784fce5ae 6585 devel optional rocblas_5.3.3+dfsg-2_source.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=vUXf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: