Your message dated Thu, 14 Jun 2007 14:20:43 -0700 with message-id <20070614212043.GQ4120@volo.donarmstrong.com> and subject line Bug#271138: Probably upstream/forward should be kept separate has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: debbugs: forwarded should probably set upstream
- From: martin f krafft <madduck@debian.org>
- Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 16:18:33 +0200
- Message-id: <20040911141833.GA17271@cirrus.madduck.net>
Package: debbugs Severity: wishlist Since I can't imagine another use for 'forwarded' other than sending a bug upstream, it would be nice if a forward control message could set the upstream tag. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (600, 'testing'), (98, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-k7 Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 -- Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them! .''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org> : :' : proud Debian developer, admin, and user `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 271138-done@bugs.debian.org, Martin F Krafft <mkrafft@ch-open.ch>
- Subject: Re: Bug#271138: Probably upstream/forward should be kept separate
- From: Don Armstrong <don@donarmstrong.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 14:20:43 -0700
- Message-id: <20070614212043.GQ4120@volo.donarmstrong.com>
- Mail-followup-to: 271138-done@bugs.debian.org, Martin F Krafft <mkrafft@ch-open.ch>
- In-reply-to: <20070614210043.GB16153@lapse.madduck.net>
- References: <[🔎] 20070614145856.GQ4120@volo.donarmstrong.com> <20070614210043.GB16153@lapse.madduck.net>
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, Martin F Krafft wrote: > also sprach Don Armstrong <don@donarmstrong.com> [2007.06.14.1558 +0100]: > > Because of the two different ways forward is set now (one with a > > message to -forward, the other using the forward control comamnd) it > > seems like we should keep these seperate. > > > > It's easy enough to tag upstream if you want. > > so close the bug? Yeah; I'm going to try to flesh out the control modification in submit@ messages, so this should resolve the main set of problems. Don Armstrong -- He was wrong. Nature abhors dimensional abnormalities, and seals them neatly away so that they don't upset people. Nature, in fact, abhors a lot of things, including vacuums, ships called the Marie Celeste, and the chuck keys for electric drills. -- Terry Pratchet _Pyramids_ p166 http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
--- End Message ---