On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 07:59:07PM -0800, Alexander Hvostov wrote: > On Wed, 2003-01-22 at 01:17, John Holroyd wrote: > > Form yourself a LUG and teach these lost souls the truth of St. Ignucius > > Bible and the Glory of Emacs. ;) > > Why isn't there a religion of nano? I want to worship nano, dammit!! Yeah! Nano and XEmacs forever! :) Nano is great on the console, and XEmacs is the best editor (IMHO) for X (and for programming). OTOH, vi serves no good purpose anywhere. IMHO. *grin* -- Vikki Roemer Homepage: http://www.2khiway.net/users/vroemer Registered Linux user #2880021 http://counter.li.org/ "Just because you're not paranoid, that doesn't mean they're not out to get you." (ripped from someone's slashdot .sig) PGP fingerprint: 0A3E 0AE4 CCD9 FF31 B4BB C859 2DE1 B1D8 5CE0 1578 Keyserver: http://pgp.mit.edu/ -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GAT d-(?) s: a--- C++++(++) UL++++ P+>++++ L+++>++++ E>++ W++ N+ o? K- w--() O? M? V?(-) PS+(+++) PE++(+++) Y+ PGP++ t+@ 5 X-() R*(?) tv-- b+++(++) DI+ D--(?) G e-(*)>+++++ h! r-- x? ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Attachment:
pgproGHCHL89J.pgp
Description: PGP signature