[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#830344: marked as done (How should the TC help with a project roadmap?)

Your message dated Thu, 25 Aug 2016 19:42:35 +0200
with message-id <6851944.68Gl8PmQ9t@gyllingar>
and subject line Re: Bug#830344: Project Roadmap question - Call for votes
has caused the Debian Bug report #830344,
regarding How should the TC help with a project roadmap?
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
830344: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=830344
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: tech-ctte
User: tech-ctte@packages.debian.org

Mehdi has proposed that the TC be involved in some fashion with a
"project roadmap". Some of the TC members met in person at debconf 16 to
talk about how that might work. I will attempt to (badly) summarize some
of the ideas brought out in that meeting with the goal of encouraging a
more complete discussion here.

I think we had general agreement on a couple of notions:

 1) Work in Debian is done by developers at their own discretion.
 2) We do not want to stop people working on anything

I think that Sam suggested that the TC could help encourage work on
goals which were well specified and already in progress

Keith suggested that the TC could help identify useful goals which were
less well specified and less active.

The end goal of this bug should be a response to the DPL's request.

-- 
-keith

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Le jeudi, 25 août 2016, 18.13:27 h CEST Tollef Fog Heen a écrit :
> ]] "Margarita Manterola"
> > 1) The TC volunteers to be the Roadmap team
> > 2) The TC volunteers to be part of the regular workflow of the
> >      Roadmap team, as an advisory body.
> > 3) The TC shouldn't be part of the regular workflow of the Roadmap team.
> >     We will always be available for escalations, as usual.
> > 4) Further Discussion.
> 
> 3 > 2 = 4 > 1

With this vote (no matter any vote change from Sam), the outcome is no longer 
in doubt.

The winner is:
         Option 3 "The TC shouldn't be part of the regular workflow of the
         Roadmap team. We will always be available for escalations, as usual"

I'm therefore hereby closing this bug while CC'ing the leader for further 
steps.

-- 
Cheers,
    OdyX
Starting results calculation at Thu Aug 25 17:31:26 2016

/--1234
V: 3214 marga
V: 3312 fil
V: 3312 don
V: 2132 hartmans
V: 3214 odyx
V: 3212 tfheen
Option 1 "The TC volunteers to be the Roadmap team"
Option 2 "The TC volunteers to be part of the regular workflow of the Roadmap team, as an advisory body"
Option 3 "The TC shouldn't be part of the regular workflow of the Roadmap team. We will always be available for escalations, as usual"
Option 4 "Further Discussion"

In the following table, tally[row x][col y] represents the votes that
option x received over option y.

                  Option
              1     2     3     4 
            ===   ===   ===   === 
Option 1            0     1     2 
Option 2      4           1     3 
Option 3      5     5           5 
Option 4      3     2     1       



Looking at row 2, column 1, 2
received 4 votes over 1

Looking at row 1, column 2, 1
received 0 votes over 2.

Option 1 Reached quorum: 2 >= 2
Option 2 Reached quorum: 3 >= 2
Option 3 Reached quorum: 5 >= 2


Dropping Option 1 because of Majority. (0.666666666666667)  0.667 (2/3) <= 1
Option 2 passes Majority.               1.500 (3/2) > 1
Option 3 passes Majority.               5.000 (5/1) > 1


  Option 3 defeats Option 2 by (   5 -    1) =    4 votes.
  Option 2 defeats Option 4 by (   3 -    2) =    1 votes.
  Option 3 defeats Option 4 by (   5 -    1) =    4 votes.


The Schwartz Set contains:
         Option 3 "The TC shouldn't be part of the regular workflow of the Roadmap team. We will always be available for escalations, as usual"



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

The winners are:
         Option 3 "The TC shouldn't be part of the regular workflow of the Roadmap team. We will always be available for escalations, as usual"

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


--- End Message ---
Reply to: